Billing Leading Therapy Home
My feedback
32 results found
-
28 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
75 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
206 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
206 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
301 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Billing Leading Therapy Home
commented
This is a must for us. Our major payer discounts their reimbursement rates when more than one service code is billed. Since they are receiving these service codes separately, they are first reimbursing at the full rate, but then sending requests for the difference to be mailed back to them once they've processed the second claim containing the second service code.
Billing Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
247 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Billing Leading Therapy Home
commented
This would save providers so much time with claim research, corrections and resubmissions!
Billing Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
-
139 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Billing Leading Therapy Home
commented
This would be wonderful!
Billing Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Billing Leading Therapy Home
commented
It would be extremely helpful to be able to assign different copay/coinsurance amounts to different service types in each client's Bill To & Insurance section. We have many clients who have a copay for one type of therapy, but no copay for another. Or, their coinsurance amount differs depending on the service type and number of units billed. Because their member cost-share differs from day to day, or week to week, there is a lot of manual work involved when it comes to billing and processing ERAs. If Theranest had this feature, our practice would be able to utilize the batch payments feature instead of having to go in to each client's profile and process their payments individually.
Billing Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
-
95 votesBilling Leading Therapy Home
supported this idea
·
From a compliance standpoint, we need a superbill that reflects our insurance rate, the amount collected from the patient, the adjustment amount, and a zero balance due.
If we do not process the adjustment as a write off, the superbill will reflect it as a balance due, but if we process the write-off, it changes the billed amount to the amount we collected from the patient. Neither of these options are compliant. We were advised by a TN expert to use the Invoice Footnote to input an explanation, but that doesn't fix the issue, and this would be very time-consuming for each individual patient.