Steven Harner
My feedback
41 results found
-
101 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
162 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
148 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
225 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
301 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
189 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
223 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
385 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
520 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
641 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
-
28 votes
-
53 votes
-
163 votesSteven Harner
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
-
22 votes
-
25 votes
-
102 votes
-
199 votes
This is an extremely important fix that, IMHO, is long-long overdue...The other problem is that not permitting bulk signing progress notes became even more a problem when the platform changed a bit ago because of other tech updates. For instance, I have a group practice, and when one employee leaves and they have not signed their notes and then we deactivate the former staff member; when another employee takes over that case and is "Assigned" all of the previous therapists notes seemingly fall under the new therapists name, even when the new therapist did not provide the services! So, unless every therapist signs every note, you run the risk of a therapist who was clearly listed as 'assigned' when the note was written (their name is clearly in the provider autofill box) will just simply 'disappear' on that same note, and any newly assigned clinicians name will magically appear--even on those back notes! This is a documentation system nightmare that I do believe requires urgent attention.