Emily P
My feedback
3 results found
-
90 votesEmily P
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Emily P
commented
It would be so helpful and adhere better to legal/billing practices if supervisors were linked to individual clients instead of specific interns. Currently, an intern who requires supervisor co-signature cannot remove a supervisor from a case. This is a big problem when interns have more than one supervisor, because then that supervisor is listed on every client, even those who they do not personally supervise.
-
30 votesEmily P
supported this idea
·
-
92 votesEmily P
supported this idea
·
Make it possible to select have just ONE supervisor required to link with each client, rather than ALL supervisors for a particular supervisee.
A problem for our training program is that we have multiple supervisors attached to one supervisee. This results in too many notifications to supervisors. It also leads to inaccurate record-keeping suggesting that each case is supervised by multiple supervisors when that is not the case.
This problem for training programs would be fixed completely if we had the ability to "x/cross out" supervisors so that only ONE supervisor is required for each case, rather than ALL supervisors linked to the supervisee required for each case.